Healthcare Organizations Are Unsatisfied With Credentialing Experience

Healthcare Organizations Are Unsatisfied With Credentialing ExperienceCredentialing processes are generally outdated, burdensome and plagued with delays, according to a new survey on the state of today’s medical credentialing processes. It was found that 1 in 3 healthcare organizations are not satisfied with the credentialing experience.nnThe SkillSurvey survey of nearly 500 healthcare industry leaders was intended to discover the impact credentialing delays and inefficiencies have on a healthcare organization’s bottom line. Notably, more than half of all U.S. states now recognize negligent credentialing as a reason for litigation against healthcare organizations, according to information from SkillSurvey.nn”As our study shows, the traditional credentialing process is outdated and slow. While waiting to be fully credentialed, top medical talent sits on the bench, negatively affecting the hospital revenue cycle,” Ray Bixler, president and CEO of SkillSurvey, said in a statement. “Our survey shows that one in three job applicants are not satisfied with their credentialing experience. Credentialing is long overdue for an upgrade.”nnHere are four additional survey findings.nn1. Two in three credentialing processes (67 percent) are taking longer than five to six weeks to credential a clinician.nn2. Sixty-two percent of respondents said it takes from one to three weeks for peer references to respond to traditional credentialing requests.nn3. Half of respondents report it takes one to two weeks to verify a hospital affiliation.nn4. Nine in 10 organizations believe it is critical to continue improving the applicant onboarding experience within the credentialing process.nnThis article was originally posted on BeckersHospitalReview.com.nn 

Accounting, Bookkeeping is not Healthcare

Accounting, Bookkeeping is not HealthcareOr is it? We can’t help patients, cure disease or fix trauma without a healthy practice.nnMany providers have sought the perceived safe harbor of hospital employment. That is OK for some, a good idea for others but, in my experience, a huge mistake for most. It is also my experience that the reason used to make the mistake is, at the end of the day, bookkeeping or the lack of it being done properly. Private practice is a business and, when run successfully with good operations, good and honest information and analysis, and well thought–through strategic decision–making, the last and worst option is hospital system employment.nn


nn

Todd150About R. Todd Welter • MS, CPCnFounder and President of Welter Healthcare Partners

nMr. Welter has over 25 years of healthcare industry experience assisting physicians and other providers, hospitals and other facilities with the business side of medicine. Through strategic planning and analysis, Mr. Welter’s main focus is to strategically increase revenues and profitability in this radically changing health care environment. 
Mr. Welter has a Masters Degree in Organizational Leadership from Regis University in Denver where he has had an appointment as affiliate faculty in the School for Professional Studies for over ten years. In addition, Mr. Welter holds a faculty appointment at the University of Denver’s University College. In the Health Care Leadership program he teaches Macro Economics in Health Care and Innovative Strategies and Change in Health Care to graduate students.

A Single Payer?

Only Credentialed Medical Assistants Can Enter EHR OrdersAre there advantages of a single payer system? Some say there are.nnI happen to not be one of them. Rather we really desperately need more payers, more choice, more competition, more access and a lot more imagination.nn nn


nn

Todd150About R. Todd Welter • MS, CPCnFounder and President of Welter Healthcare Partners

nMr. Welter has over 25 years of healthcare industry experience assisting physicians and other providers, hospitals and other facilities with the business side of medicine. Through strategic planning and analysis, Mr. Welter’s main focus is to strategically increase revenues and profitability in this radically changing health care environment. 
Mr. Welter has a Masters Degree in Organizational Leadership from Regis University in Denver where he has had an appointment as affiliate faculty in the School for Professional Studies for over ten years. In addition, Mr. Welter holds a faculty appointment at the University of Denver’s University College. In the Health Care Leadership program he teaches Macro Economics in Health Care and Innovative Strategies and Change in Health Care to graduate students.

Vote No on Amendment 69 and Save Colorado's Market-Based Health Care System

Vote No on Amendment 69 and Save our Market-Based Health Care System Welter Healthcare Partners strongly believes that transparent competition among payers and providers regarding value and cost is the only way to make the delivery of health care more effective and efficient.

nColorado’s Amendment 69 does nothing to address either issue. Amendment 69 is an incredibly expensive attempt to fix what is not working, but in the process will eliminate all of the things that do work, and do work well. Why would we go backward only to regain ground we have already traveled? Amendment 69 is a baby and the bathwater approach to very complex, multifactorial societal issues affecting costs, infrastructure, taxes, the attraction, education and distribution of providers, how, why and by whom health care is consumed, etc. The backers of Amendment 69 have yet to publish a comprehensive plan to do this.nnWe need more competition, not less! We urge a vote no on 69. In doing so we should also prevent the mega–mergers which we are facing with Anthem and CIGNA, Aetna and Humana. Competition is a good thing, transparency is a good thing; we should move in the direction of both and we should do so expeditiously.n

Click here for more information on Amendment 69 and to endorse NO!