Jan 2, 2013 | Uncategorized
Congress passed The American Taxpayer Relief Act of 2012, to avert the “fiscal cliff.” President Obama is expected to sign the legislation shortly.nnIn addition to various tax and spending measures, the legislation includes provisions of direct importance to medical group practices. The legislation:n
n
- Prevents the Medicare physician payment SGR cut for one year. It eliminates the 27 percent Medicare physician payment cut, which took effect today and replaces it with a “zero percent update” to the Medicare physician fee schedule conversion factor for 2013. As has occurred with prior temporary extensions of this kind, this is not a fee schedule rate freeze. It means any conversion factor adjustments and RVU changes contained in the final fee schedule rule for 2013 may result in payment rate changes, but the massive SGR cut is nullified for a year.
n
- Turns off the January 2, 2013 sequester for two months. This prevents various defense and other automatic cuts from occurring, including an across the board, two percent cut for all Medicare providers. It’s expected Congress will revisit issues related to the sequester in the near future.
n
- Extends the Medicare 1.0 work RVU GPCI floor through December 31, 2013
n
- Increases the Medicare Part B equipment utilization assumption for advanced imaging services to 90 percent effective for fee schedules established for 2014 and subsequent years, thus reducing future payments
n
- Extends the Medicare therapy cap exception process through December 31, 2013
n
- Increases the Medicare therapy service multiple procedure payment reduction from 25 to 50 percent effective April 1, 2013
n
Dec 27, 2012 | Uncategorized
A new report from the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (AHRQ) highlights the cumulative experiences of more than 100 grantees that implemented major health IT projects between 2004 and 2007.nnThe report, Effective Teamwork and Sustainability in Health IT Implementation, reviews grantee experiences related to planning, long-term use, partnerships, vendor relationships, and end-user perceptions a few years after the end of the project period. According to the grantees, the most important factors affecting the sustainability of health IT were the ability to demonstrate benefits from health IT to grantees’ organizations, clinician support, and cost–related issues. Grantees said that most health IT products that were implemented and upgraded during the study continue to be used. However, they reported that in order for health IT projects to be successful, clinician buy-in and support must be established early in the planning period and be sustained during implementation and maintenance phases. Effective planning, including completing a detailed workflow analysis, implementation plan and process re-design assessment prior to implementation, were strong markers of long-term viability.nnThe report is available here.
Dec 19, 2012 | Uncategorized
Physicians are scheduled to receive a 26.5 percent reduction in payments starting Jan. 1 unless Congress intervenes. Action to avert the cut is being considered as part of broader fiscal cliff negotiations on tax and spending policies. However, these discussions remain up in the air, creating uncertainty over the timing of a solution.nnThe latest estimates from the Congressional Budget Office (CBO) indicate that a one-year patch to prevent the SGR cut would cost $25 billion. While most members of Congress agree that the current Medicare payment system must be repealed, the cost is daunting. Details should emerge in the coming week.
Dec 12, 2012 | Uncategorized
Here a few highlights from Becker’s Hospital Review 10 Major Takeaways From CMS’ FY 2012 Financial Report–Click here to view the article in full.nnOne of the most important organizations within the healthcare sector is CMS, and for obvious reasons. It is one of the largest healthcare payors in the world, and the federal agency dictates many of the rules that will directly and indirectly impact the finances of hospitals and health systems.nnOn Nov. 15, CMS posted its FY 2012 financial report. CMS CFO Deborah Taylor, a certified public accountant, prepared the 202-page document, which is required by law every year. Here are 10 of the biggest takeaways from the report.nnWhat the nation’s healthcare dollar looked like in 2012. Government health programs consume the largest parts of the U.S. healthcare system, and CMS’ report broke down the different healthcare payors and how much money they represented in FY 2012. Here’s how much each sector represented for every dollar spent on the U.S. healthcare last year:nn• Private insurance: 31.6 centsn• Medicare: 21 centsn• Medicaid: 16.3 centsn• Other government programs: 13.3 centsn• Out-of-pocket: 11.1 centsn• Other private programs: 6.7 centsnnFurthermore, Medicare and Medicaid, including state funding, represented 54 cents of every dollar spent on nursing homes, 49 cents of every dollar received by hospitals and 33 cents of every dollar spent on physician services.nnMedicare Part A Benefit Payments. Inpatient hospital spending accounted for 54 percent of Medicare Hospital Insurance, or Part A, benefit outlays in FY 2012. Managed care represented the next-highest total at 25 percent, while skilled nursing facilities received 12 percent of Part A payments.nnMedicare Part B Benefit Payments. Medicare Part B, or Supplementary Medical Insurance, covers all physician, hospital outpatient, home health, lab test and other services not covered by Part A. Physicians services accounted for the largest slice of Part B at 24 percent. Prescription drugs accounted for 21 percent, while hospital outpatient services represented 11 percent.nnMedicaid Enrollees. Children represented the largest portion of Medicaid beneficiaries in FY 2012 at 50 percent. The remaining enrollees were adults (23 percent), disabled (18 percent) and elderly (9 percent).nnFederal Medicaid costs. State and federal medical assistance payments and administrative costs totaled $452.5 billion last year. CMS’ share of Medicaid outlays totaled $260.1 billion of that total.nnMedicare and Medicaid Recovery Auditors. Medicare RACs recovered $2.3 billion in over–payments in FY 2012, as reported earlier. However, that figure does not include dollar amounts related to claims in the appeals process or claims that had been successfully appealed by providers.nnMedicaid RACs were supposed to go live Jan. 1, 2012, although not all states have finalized their programs. According to the report, “states that have been unable to implement Medicaid RAC programs by Jan. 1, 2012, have been submitting [state plan amendments] to CMS requesting implementation delay exceptions.” CMS released a Medicaid RAC final rule in September 2011, projecting savings of $2.1 billion over the next five years. Roughly $910 million of that total would be returned to states.nnSource: www.beckershospitalreview.com Bob Herman; December 7, 2012.
Dec 5, 2012 | Uncategorized
Almost 10 percent of U.S. patients receive their healthcare from an accountable care organization (ACO), and almost half live in areas served by at least one ACO, according to a new study from Oliver Wyman. This means that ACOs, little known in the United States as recently as two years ago, now have a substantial presence and are poised to offer a competitive threat to traditional fee-for-service medicine.nn“There’s a common impression that ACOs play a minuscule role in American healthcare,” says Niyum Gandhi, one of the authors of the study. “But when you go out and actually count what’s on the ground, you realize that they’re already achieving critical mass.”nnThere is no single, universal definition for ACOs. In its census, Oliver Wyman counted not just participants in Medicare’s various ACO programs, but also commercial ACOs and healthcare delivery organizations that apply some other name to themselves but follow the basic elements of the accountable care organization: They are healthcare providers that take responsibility for the full healthcare needs of a defined population, receiving savings payments based on cost savings and quality.nnThe ACA directed Medicare to create ACO programs – today there are 150 Medicare ACOs, and the number is expected to more than double in January, when Medicare announces the next class of participants in its Shared Savings Program. Because it is difficult to operate a single organization under a fee-for-service and an ACO model at the same time, most participants in Medicare ACO programs eventually shift their non-Medicare patients to ACO models as well.nnA total of 25 to 31 million U.S. patients currently receive their care through ACOs. They include:n
n
- 2.4 million patients in Medicare ACO programs
n
- 15 million non-Medicare patients in Medicare-oriented ACOs
n
- 8 to 14 million patients in non-Medicare ACOs
n
nBecause Medicare’s ACO programs were designed to create a care delivery model that could compete with fee-for-service, the Oliver Wyman study analyzed how many people lived in a locale served by at least one ACO. The astonishing answer: 45 percent of Americans. And there are 19 states in which more than half of the population live in an area served by at least one ACO.nnCritics have argued that few of today’s ACOs live up to the potential of the model, and the Oliver Wyman team are quick to agree. “Many of the organizations we have looked at are really ACOs in name only,” says coauthor Rick Weil. “But this is a case where averages don’t count. Instead, you look at the spread of the new model and the performance of the best-in-class. And best-in-class ACOs are delivering exceptional results. For example, one California ACO had a zero percent premium increase its first year—something many people in healthcare would have said was impossible. As more and more ACOs learn to make the model work, they have the potential to change the whole dynamic of U.S. healthcare for the better.”nnSource: www.thestreet.com; November 29, 2012.
Nov 28, 2012 | Uncategorized
At the 98th meeting of the Radiological Society of North America in Chicago on Nov. 26, 2012, Keith J. Dreyer, DO, PhD, vice chairman of radiology at Massachusetts General Hospital in Boston and associate professor of radiology at Harvard Medical School, discussed the future of imaging informatics in the face of meaningful use.nnCMS’ meaningful use program is one of the ways the federal government is focusing on quality, safety and access with healthcare, said Dr. Dreyer. By urging providers to use certified electronic health record technology, the federal government is hoping that safety and quality of healthcare will increase while the cost of healthcare will decrease. According to Dr. Dreyer, physicians and radiologists need incentives to have a patient-centric focus in their healthcare decisions and that is what meaningful use is — an incentive.nnDr. Dreyer pointed out that more than 50 percent of physicians and 80 percent of hospitals have enrolled in the meaningful use program, with payments passing $7 billion, from when meaningful use legislation as part of the HITECH Act was first passed in February 2009 to when the most recent regulations — stage 2 of meaningful use — were released.nn”What does this mean for radiologists? Well, nearly all radiologists are eligible for the program. In 2011, 32 percent of radiologists said they planned to participate, and in 2012, that percentage has doubled,” said Dr. Dreyer. “While meaningful use can be a challenge for radiologists, there are various exclusions and temporary exemptions available. The thing to remember is that the stages of meaningful use are important.”nnThe stage 2 regulations for meaningful use have two specific objectives for imaging:n
n
- Image ordering measure: Physicians have to use certified electronic health record technology to order more than 30 percent of imaging exams.
n
- Image results measure: Physicians have to use CEHRT to receive more than 10 percent of imaging results.
n
nDr. Dreyer concluded his presentation by commenting on the futures state of radiology and healthcare in general. “There are four metrics that I see as being important: productivity, profitability, performance and presence. The future of healthcare technology will hinge mostly on performance and presence. [Going forward], quality and relevance can drastically increase,” said Dr. Dreyer. “Productivity may take a hit for a while, and if you hinge your profits to productivity, you may see decreases. However, if profits are tied to quality and performance metrics, there will be better outcomes in the long run.”nnSource: www.beckershospitalreview.com; Kathleen Roney; November 28, 2012.nn