Dec 4, 2017 | Uncategorized
There is a lot of confusion surrounding reporting for transitional care management (TCM) services. CPT offers the following options to report TCM services:n
n
- 99495 – Transitional Care Management services with the following required elements: communication (direct contact, telephone, electronic) with the patient and/or caregiver within 2 business days of discharge; medical decision making of at least moderate complexity during the service period; face-to-face visit, within 14 calendar days of discharge
n
- 99496 – Communication (direct contact, telephone, electronic) with the patient and/or caregiver within 2 business days of discharge; medical decision making of high complexity during the service period; face-to-face visit, within 7 calendar days of discharge
n
nWhen billing for TCM services, the rendering provider must assume all responsibility for the patient’s care post-discharge leaving no gap in care. The rendering provider must deliver care during the patient’s transition back home following discharge. The patient must return to his/her residence following discharge. Authorized community settings include: home, domiciliary, rest home, assisted living facility. TCM cannot be reported if a patient is discharged from one inpatient facility to another inpatient facility, such as a skilled nursing facility. Each patient must meet the complexity requirements for each CPT code (i.e. moderate for 99495 and high for 99496).nnCMS allows TCM services to be reported in the following discharge settings:n
n
- Inpatient acute care hospital
n
- Inpatient psychiatric hospital
n
- Long-term care hospital
n
- Skilled nursing facility
n
- Inpatient rehabilitation facility
n
- Hospital outpatient observation or partial hospitalization
n
- Partial hospitalization at a community mental health center
n
Nov 28, 2017 | Uncategorized
On Nov. 2, CMS received the 2018 final payment rule, providing a 1.2 percent increase in ASC reimbursement next year. The final rule also addressed several issues pertaining to orthopedic procedures in ASCs, including total joint replacements and spine procedures.nnHere are five ways the final rule will affect orthopedic ASCs, according to guidance from ASCA:n
n
- Total knee replacements: CMS removed total knee replacement from the inpatient only list, but did not add it to the ASC payable list. The agency will continue discussion on other joint replacement codes before removing them from the inpatient only list as well. While some in the industry are excited by this move, which could bring total knee replacements a step closer to the ASC payable list, others feel it could have a negative impact on an ASC’s ability to negotiate fair contracts with private payers if CMS sets the rate too low.
n
- Total and partial hip replacements: In the proposed final rule, CMS solicited comments for adding total and partial hip replacements to the ASC payable list, but decided not to add them in the final rule, stating, “Our understanding is that these procedures typically require more than 24 hours of active medical care following the procedure.”
n
- Spine surgery: CMS added two spine procedures to the ASC payable list, including total disc arthroplasty with discectomy (22856) and second-level cervical disc arthroplasty with discectomy (22858).
n
- Quality reporting: A new quality measure was approved that will affect orthopedic surgery centers specifically: ASC-17 will collect data via claims for hospital visits after orthopedic procedures in the ASC. Data collected over the next few years will affect payment determination in 2022 and subsequent years.
n
- Payment rates: Overall, ASCs received a 1.2 percent reimbursement increase and hospital outpatient departments received a 1.35 percent increase.
n
nTo learn more about orthopedic-driven ASC reimbursement and what to expect from CMS in the future, attend the Becker’s 16th Annual Future of Spine + The Spine, Orthopedic and Pain Management-Driven ASC Conference June 14-16, 2018 in Chicago. Click here to learn more and click here to register.nnThis article wasvoriginally posted on beckersasc.com.
Nov 22, 2017 | Uncategorized
All of us at Welter Healthcare Partners, would like to wish our clients, families and friends a Happy Thanksgiving! We are grateful for the relationships we have formed and for your continued to support of Welter Healthcare Partners. In observance of the holiday, we will be closed on Thursday, November 23rd to give our employees the opportunity to spend time with their loved ones. We will resume normal business hours on Friday, November 24th, and will be available to assist you!
Nov 15, 2017 | Uncategorized
Decision-making in its most basic form is the act of choosing between two or more courses of action. Each and every person in the world is faced with the decision-making process on a daily basis – whether it’s trivial things like deciding what is for dinner or which route to take to work or more serious life-changing decisions like what your next career move should be or which home is the best long-term investment for your family. To be effective in the decision-making process, it is imperative to avoid impulsive behavior and really think each scenario through. This can be done via pros/cons list, intuition, and/or reasoning. All methods have both advantages and disadvantages. Regardless of the method(s) chosen, avoid the following problems that can hinder effective decision-making: not having enough information to see the big picture, having too much information and going down the path of “analysis paralysis”, having too many hands in the pot, vested interests, emotional attachments, and having no emotional attachment. Being effective in the decision-making process is key to future success!
Nov 7, 2017 | Uncategorized
On November 2, CMS issued a final rule that includes updates to payment policies, payment rates, and quality provisions for services furnished under the Medicare Physician Fee Schedule (PFS) on or after January 1, 2018.nnThe overall update to payments under the PFS based on the finalized CY 2018 rates will be +0.41 percent. This update reflects the +0.50 percent update established under the Medicare Access and CHIP Reauthorization Act of 2015, reduced by 0.09 percent, due to the misvalued code target recapture amount, required under the Achieving a Better Life Experience Act of 2014. After applying these adjustments, and the budget neutrality adjustment to account for changes in Relative Value Units, all required by law, the final 2018 PFS conversion factor is $35.99, an increase to the 2017 PFS conversion factor of $35.89.nnThe Final Rule Includes:n
n
- Patients over Paperwork Initiative
n
- Changes in valuation for specific services
n
- Payment rates for nonexcepted off-campus provider-based hospital departments
n
- Medicare telehealth services
n
- Malpractice relative value units
n
- Care management services
n
- Improvement of payment rates for office-based behavioral health services
n
- Evaluation and management comment solicitation
n
- Emergency department visits comment solicitation
n
- Solicitation of public comments on initial data collection and reporting periods for Clinical Laboratory Fee Schedule
n
- Part B drugs: Payment for biosimilar biological products
n
- Part B drug payment: Infusion drugs furnished through an item of durable medical equipment
n
- New care coordination services and payment for rural health clinics and federally-qualified health centers
n
- Appropriate use criteria for advanced diagnostic imaging
n
- Medicare Diabetes Prevention Program expanded model
n
- Physician Quality Reporting System
n
- Patient relationship codes
n
- Medicare Shared Savings Program
n
- 2018 Value Modifier
n
nClick here to read original releasennThis article originally posted on cms.gov.
Nov 1, 2017 | Uncategorized
Unfortunately, many healthcare providers are missing out on things like electronic billing, email capture.nnA new survey by the Medical Group Management Association suggests providers, especially hospitals, are missing out on key areas to improve when it comes to patient billing, payments and satisfaction.nnThe Digital Payments Progress report, a product of a partnership with medical claims management company Navicure, is a national survey conducted among MGMA member organization this past May.nnThe report shows that physician practices seem to have the advantage when it comes to billing and payments. For instance, 79 percent of ambulatory organization respondents can generate a cost estimate upon request, while only 69 percent of hospital respondents can do so.nnAlso, 64 percent of group practice respondents reported patients are comfortable sharing their email address, while only 56 percent of hospital respondents had that perception.n“In actuality, 79 percent of patients report feeling comfortable providing their email address. This represents an opportunity to leverage email addresses to deliver bills electronically, saving the industry millions of dollars in cost, environmental waste and days in A/R,” the report said.nnThere are also other key areas where all providers could be doing a better job of playing to the needs and wants of consumers. Despite a majority of patients’ preference for electronic billing, 52 percent specifically, 77 percent of respondents still send paper bills. A similar study conducted in January by Navicure and Himss Analytics showed the same trend, with 52 percent of patients preferring electronic billing but 89 percent of providers saying they still used regular mail.nnThe HIMSS/Navicure study also showed keeping a credit card on file is something that 78 percent of patients approve of for small charges totaling less than $200 but only 20 percent of providers used this method.nnThe Progress Report echoed this notion, with results showing CCOF would be highly beneficial to revenue cycle management, and ultimately a provider’s bottom line. It helped reduce patient bad debt/write off, according to 36 percent of respondents, and 34 percent said it cut days in patient A/R and cost of collections, the report said.nnIn an age of consumerism, where patients are paying more out-of-pocket costs and shopping around for providers and services, practices and hospitals alike would do well to pay attention to these trends among patients, who now act more like retail consumers who go where their needs and preferences are met. Consumers have voiced a willingness to switch providers in order to have services like telehealth available to them. Chances are, as they become even more discerning and demanding, something seemingly small like electronic billing could prove pivotal when it comes to keeping patients’ business.nnThis article originally posted on healthcarefinancenews.com
Oct 24, 2017 | Uncategorized
MI code updatesnnThe list of ICD-10 code updates is extensive and Myocardial Infarctions got a makeover with this year’s revision. Code category I21 has been renamed from “ST elevation and non-ST elevation myocardial infarction” to “Acute myocardial infarction”. Additional specificity options now include type 1, type 2, and other MI types. Providers will need to specify in clinical documentation the type of MI the patient experienced. STEMI codes (I21.0 and I21.1) are now defined as Type 1 MIs. New codes I21.A1 – MI type 2 and I21.A9 – other MI type are also important and notable additions.
Oct 18, 2017 | Uncategorized
WASHINGTON — President Trump reversed course Wednesday and threw cold water on a new bipartisan congressional health care plan designed to maintain subsidies for health insurance exchanges, thereby temporarily propping up the Affordable Care Act.nnA day after signaling support for the plan developed by Sens. Lamar Alexander, R-Tenn., and Patty Murray, D-Wash., Trump tweeted Wednesday that the deal might benefit insurance companies too much.nnAlexander, in a series of tweets Wednesday, indicated the deal may still have a chance. After getting a phone call from Trump, he wrote that he agrees the subsidies should benefit consumers and not insurers.nn”The Alexander-Murray agreement has strong language to do that, and I will work with the president to see if we can make it even stronger,” Alexander tweeted.nnMurray and Alexander have been drafting a bill for several months to boost the insurance marketplace, but the effort took on new urgency last week when Trump announced he would no longer fund the subsidies without congressional action.nnWhile House and Senate Democratic leaders said they support the compromise, Republican leaders aren’t eager to bring it to the floor for a vote.nnHouse Speaker Paul Ryan’s press secretary, Doug Andres, said in a Wednesday statement, “The speaker does not see anything that changes his view that the Senate should keep its focus on repeal and replace of Obamacare.”nnOn Tuesday, Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell, R-Ky., told reporters, “We haven’t had a chance to think about the way forward yet.”nnRegardless of Trump’s position, the deal’s Senate supporters will pursue an even number of bipartisan cosponsors to help build pressure for a vote, Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer of New York told reporters Wednesday.nn”I spoke to Senator Alexander this morning, and I encouraged him, ‘Let’s go forward, period,’ and he’s game,” Schumer said. Once cosponsors are lined up, Schumer said he’ll ask McConnell for a vote.nn”If that happened, I would be quite certain it would pass…and then there would be pressure on the House,” he said. “If the president will come out strongly for the bill and stick to that, that will help us get it through the House.”nnAlexander also said Trump and the House will have to consider the agreement once more senators are on board.n
CLICK HERE TO READ MORE
nThis article originally posted on usatoday.com.
Oct 12, 2017 | Uncategorized
Physician practices may begin data collection as late as December 31 and still avoid the negative payment adjustment.nnOctober 2, 2017, marked practices’ deadline to begin collecting data for the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services’ (CMS) “pick your pace” option two under the merit-based incentive-payment system (MIPS) track of the Medicare Access and CHIP Reauthorization Act (MACRA).nnFor this transition year of the Quality Payment Program under MIPS, practices can participate in one of three ways:n
n
- Submit data covering a full year
n
- Submit data covering at least a consecutive 90-day period (avoid negative adjustment and possibly become eligible for a positive payment adjustment)
n
- Submit a minimum amount of data (<90 days) (doctors may submit just one day of data to avoid a pay cut in 2019 for 2017 performance, but more data boosts odds of bonus)
n
nTherefore, practices can begin data collection as late as December 31, 2017, and still avoid the negative payment adjustment, CMS advised. However, more data increases one’s likelihood of earning a positive payment adjustment.nnPhysicians must submit their 2017 MIPS performance data from January 2, 2018, to March 31, 2018. CMS will cut Medicare pay 4% in 2019 for doctors who do not submit data during that time.nnThis article originally posted on healthleadersmedia.com.
Oct 10, 2017 | Uncategorized
As most medical practices are aware, not all cases are easy to navigate using the latest medical standards. The information below highlights a complicated cardio surgical case with an detailed cardio case, correct CPT and ICD-10 codes. Do you have a complicated surgery case need help with coding? Welter Healthcare Partners would love to help! please upload the operative note by clicking on the link below. Remember to remove ALL patient protected health information and organization identifiers. Welter Healthcare Partners will not use any medical records submitted in which PHI is not removed and protected. Click Here To Submit Redacted Surgery Case Study. Click Here To Submit Redacted Surgery Case Studynn
nn nnPROCEDURES:n
n
- Left heart catheterization.
n
- Left ventricular angiography.
n
- Bilateral selective coronary artery angiography.
n
- Coronary artery bypass graft angiography x3.
n
- Coronary artery disease.
n
nINDICATIONS:n
Prop for tricuspid valve surgery.
n
Click Here to View Full Case
n nnCorrect CPT and ICD-10 Codes with modifiers and units:nn93459 (26 modifier) – Catheter placement in coronary artery(s) for coronary angiography, including intraprocedural injection(s) for coronary angiography, imaging supervision and interpretation; with left heart catheterization including intraprocedural injection(s) for left ventriculography, when performed, catheter placement(s) in bypass graft(s) (internal mammary, free arterial, venous grafts) with bypass graft angiographynnI25.10 – Atherosclerotic heart disease of native coronary artery without angina pectorisnI25.82 – Chronic total occlusion of coronary arterynI07.1 – Rheumatic tricuspid insufficiency
Oct 4, 2017 | Uncategorized
As most medical practices are aware, not all cases are easy to navigate using the latest medical standards. The information below highlights a complicated cardio surgical case with an detailed cardio case, correct CPT and ICD-10 codes. Do you have a complicated surgery case need help with coding? Welter Healthcare Partners would love to help! please upload the operative note by clicking on the link below. Remember to remove ALL patient protected health information and organization identifiers. Welter Healthcare Partners will not use any medical records submitted in which PHI is not removed and protected. Click Here To Submit Redacted Surgery Case Study. Click Here To Submit Redacted Surgery Case Studynn
nn nnPROCEDURES:n
n
- Left heart catheterization.
n
- Left ventricular angiography.
n
- Bilateral selective coronary artery angiography.
n
- Coronary artery bypass graft angiography x3.
n
- Coronary artery disease.
n
nINDICATIONS:n
Prop for tricuspid valve surgery.
n
Click Here to View Full Case
n nnCorrect CPT and ICD-10 Codes with modifiers and units:nn93459 (26 modifier) – Catheter placement in coronary artery(s) for coronary angiography, including intraprocedural injection(s) for coronary angiography, imaging supervision and interpretation; with left heart catheterization including intraprocedural injection(s) for left ventriculography, when performed, catheter placement(s) in bypass graft(s) (internal mammary, free arterial, venous grafts) with bypass graft angiographynnI25.10 – Atherosclerotic heart disease of native coronary artery without angina pectorisnI25.82 – Chronic total occlusion of coronary arterynI07.1 – Rheumatic tricuspid insufficiency
Sep 27, 2017 | Uncategorized
With the implementation of QPP, the deadline for submitting 2017 performance data is approaching fast! Eligible providers can submit performance data for dates of service starting on January 1, 2017 – October 2, 2017. Data submission to CMS must be done by March 31, 2018.nnIf your practice chooses not to submit data for 2017 reporting, then you will receive a negative 4% payment adjustment. If your practice submits the minimum data required for 2017 reporting, you can avoid the negative adjustment and receive a neutral adjustment. If your practice submits partial data required for 2017, which is 90 days of 2017 data, you will receive either a neutral or positive adjustment depending on your performance. If your practice submits a full year of data for 2017, you may receive up to a 4% positive payment adjustment, again depending on your performance. The first payment adjustments based on performance go into effect on January 1, 2019.n
CLICK HERE TO SUBMIT A CASE STUDY TO THE SURGERY CODING SERIES!
Sep 27, 2017 | Uncategorized
2018 ICD-10 updates will soon go into effect on October 1st. These changes will impact encounters for dates of service October 1, 2017 through September 30, 2018. It is imperative that your organization has up-to-date coding resources and a keen understanding of the changes that will impact your reimbursement!nnThis year’s ICD-10 updates include 363 new codes, 142 deleted codes, and 250 code revisions.nnHere are notable highlights of the 2018 updates:n
n
- New musculoskeletal chapter codes to represent lumbar stenosis with or without neurogenic claudication
n
- New neoplasm chapter codes to identify all types of mast cell neoplasms, such as: malignant mast cell neoplasm, aggressive systemic mastocytosis, mast cell sarcoma, and other types.
n
- 72 new codes to identify non-pressure chronic ulcers that have penetrated muscle and bone tissue without necrosis
n
- New endocrine chapter codes to identify diabetes mellitus with ketoacidosis
n
- Myocardial Infarction codes now include specificity for type 1, type 2, and “other” MIs
n
- Two new subcategories have been created for heart failure to include specificity for right heart failure as well as chronicity, right heart failure due to left heart failure, biventricular heart failure, high output heart failure, and end-stage heart failure
n
- 17 new antenatal screening codes to identify specific screenings administered to pregnant patients, including testing for fetal growth retardation and chromosomal abnormalities
n
- New convention update regarding the use of the term “with.” The convention now specifies that, when another existing Guideline specifically requires a documented linkage between two conditions, the word “with” does not suffice. Providers will have to make it clear within their clinical documentation the cause-and-effect relationship between conditions that are related.
n
- Updates to the mental health chapter include explanatory information regarding substance abuse remission codes to include specificity for severity (i.e. mild, moderate, severe) in an effort to better align ICD-10-CM with the APA’s DSM-5
n
n*Please note this list is not all-inclusive. Click here for a comprehensive list of all 2018 changes available at the CMS website.
Sep 22, 2017 | Uncategorized
Welter Healthcare Partners is excited to present our helpful career advancing tips and strategies to sharpen the skills prospective employers look for in a coder!nnnnNo matter how much we plan things out and hope for the best, there will inevitably, always be something that we didn’t think of or plan for. That is why prioritizing, planning, and time management are such important skills to have in today’s job market. When you know what needs to be done and the deadline, you can be ready for anything that may come your way! Expect the Unexpected! You can’t see the future but if you are aware of your surroundings and potential obstacles, you can anticipate a need before it is asked of you. There is no room for procrastination in the ladder to success!
Sep 22, 2017 | Uncategorized
GOP Senators are working quickly in an effort to garner votes to replace the ACA (Affordable Care Act). Check out the most important things to note about this replacement effort, below.nnRepublican efforts in Congress to “repeal and replace” the federal Affordable Care Act are back from the dead. Again.nnWhile the chances for this last-ditch measure appear iffy, many GOP senators are rallying around a proposal by Sens. Lindsey Graham (R-S.C.) and Bill Cassidy (R-La.), along with Sens. Dean Heller (R-Nev.) and Ron Johnson (R-Wis.)nnThey are racing the clock to round up the needed 50 votes — and there are 52 Senate Republicans.nnAn earlier attempt to replace the ACA this summer fell just one vote short when Sens. Susan Collins (R-Maine), Lisa Murkowski (R-Alaska) and John McCain (R-Ariz.) voted against it. The latest push is setting off a massive guessing game on Capitol Hill about where the GOP can pick up the needed vote.n
CLICK HERE TO READ MORE
nThis article originally posted on Kaiser Health News.
Sep 15, 2017 | Uncategorized
Effective for claims with dates of service on or after Oct. 1, 2017, UnitedHealthcare will reimburse the appropriate evaluation and management (E/M) procedure code which describes the office visit, hospital care, nursing facility care, home service or domiciliary/rest home care reported in lieu of a consultation services procedure code. This notification will be the first of several communications to clarify this change in reimbursement strategy supporting our commitment to the Triple Aim of improving health care services, health outcomes and overall cost of care.nnUnitedHealthcare will align with the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) and no longer reimburse consultation services represented by CPT codes 99241-99245 and 99251-99255. At the time of the original CMS decision to no longer recognize these consultation services procedure codes, UnitedHealthcare began pursuit of data analysis and trending to better understand the use of consultation services codes as reported in the treatment of our commercial members. Similar to CMS’s findings, our extensive data analysis has revealed misuse of consultation services codes for this population.nnThe current Relative Value Unit (RVU) assignments reflect numerous changes made during recent years to both E/M codes and other surgical services creating an overall budget neutral experience supporting this strategy as a more accurate reflection of services rendered.n
New Policy – Advanced Practice Health Care Professional Evaluation and Management Procedures Policy
nEffective for claims with dates of service on or after Sept. 1, 2017, UnitedHealthcare will require physicians reporting evaluation and management (E/M) services on behalf of their employed Advanced Practice Health Care Professionals to report the services with a modifier to denote the services were provided in collaboration with a physician. UnitedHealthcare will accept the modifier SA on claims for these services when provided by nurse practitioners, physician assistants and clinical nurse specialists.nnIn addition, the rendering care provider’s National Provider Identifier (NPI) must also be documented in field 24J on the CMS-1500 claim form or its electronic equivalent. Use of the modifier SA and documentation of the rendering care provider will assist UnitedHealthcare in maintaining accurate data with regard to the types of practitioners providing services to our members.nnFor more information, call 877.842.3210 or visit UnitedHealthcareOnline.com.
Sep 15, 2017 | Uncategorized
Welter Healthcare Partners is excited to present our monthly Code Spotlight! Each month, Welter Healthcare Partners will spotlight a unique CPT or ICD-10 code to profile and discuss practice applications of the code, as well as pertinent guideline reminders.nnM48.062 – Spinal Stenosis, lumbar region, with neurogenic claudicationnThe list of ICD-10 code updates is extensive and lumbar spinal stenosis got a makeover with this year’s revision. The previous code M48.06 – Spinal stenosis, lumbar region will no longer be valid as of October 1st. There are now two new code options to replace the old code. These options now include specificity for neurogenic claudication. Spine surgeons and coders will be excited to finally have a code to capture this level of specificity!nnIt is important for coders to understand the clinical definition of neurogenic claudication. “Neurogenic claudication is the medical term used to describe the symptom of pain induced by walking,” according to spinal-healthcare.com, which goes on to call the condition “a hallmark symptom of lumbar stenosis.” Clinical documentation should include indications of trouble walking in the operative notes. If there is no indication of ambulatory issues or other signs of neurogenic claudication, you’ll assign the code for lumbar stenosis without neurogenic claudication; if the note describes the patient as having ambulatory issues due to stenosis, this could indicate claudication, in which case you’ll need to assign M48.062.
Sep 7, 2017 | Uncategorized
As part of the new coding format for our newsletter, Welter Healthcare Partners is excited to offer you a new surgery coding series in which we want to help you! The 2nd week of every month we will highlight a complicated surgical case. This week we are highlighting a general surgery case. We want to hear from you! If you have a complicated surgery case and need help with coding, please upload the operative note by clicking on the link below. Remember to remove ALL patient protected health information and organization identifiers. Welter Healthcare Partners will not use any medical records submitted in which PHI is not removed and protected. Click Here To Submit Redacted Surgery Case Study. Click Here To Submit Redacted Surgery Case StudynnPreoperative Diagnoses:n
n
- Lumbar degenerative deformity
n
- Lumbar spinal stenosis
n
- Low back pain
n
- Lumbar radiculopathy
n
- Lumbar multilevel degenerative disk disease
n
- Multilevel lumbar facet arthrosis
n
nPostoperative Diagnoses:n
n
- Lumbar degenerative deformity
n
- Low back pain
n
- Lumbar radiculopathy
n
- Lumbar multilevel degenerative disk disease
n
- Multilevel lumbar facet arthrosis
n
n
Click Here To View Full Case
nCorrect CPT and ICD-10 Codes with modifiers and units:nn22612 – Arthrodesis, posterior or posterolateral technique, single level; lumbar (with lateral transverse technique, when performed)n22614 x 2 – Arthrodesis, posterior or posterolateral technique, single level; each additional vertebral segmentn63042 – XS, RT – Laminotomy (hemilaminectomy), with decompression of nerve root(s), including partial facetectomy, foraminotomy and/or excision of herniated intervertebral disc, reexploration, single interspace; lumbarn63012 – 59 – Laminectomy with removal of abnormal facets and/or pars inter-articularis with decompression of cauda equina and nerve roots for spondylolisthesis, lumbar (Gill type procedure)n63047 – Laminectomy, facetectomy and foraminotomy (unilateral or bilateral with decompression of spinal cord, cauda equina and/or nerve root[s], [eg, spinal or lateral recess stenosis]), single vertebral segment; lumbarn63048 – Laminectomy, facetectomy and foraminotomy (unilateral or bilateral with decompression of spinal cord, cauda equina and/or nerve root[s], [eg, spinal or lateral recess stenosis]), single vertebral segment; each additional segment, cervical, thoracic, or lumbarn63030 – XS, LT – Laminotomy (hemilaminectomy), with decompression of nerve root(s), including partial facetectomy, foraminotomy and/or excision of herniated intervertebral disc; 1 interspace, lumbarn22842 – Posterior segmental instrumentation (eg, pedicle fixation, dual rods with multiple hooks and sublaminar wires); 3 to 6 vertebral segmentsn61783 – 26, 59- Stereotactic computer-assisted (navigational) procedure; spinaln20931 – Allograft, structural, for spine surgery onlyn20930 – Allograft, morselized, or placement of osteopromotive material, for spine surgery onlynnM48.07 – Spinal stenosis, lumbosacral regionnM47.27 – Other spondylosis with radiculopathy, lumbosacral regionnM51.37 – Other intervertebral disc degeneration, lumbosacral region
Sep 7, 2017 | Uncategorized
As a result of the many provisions of the Affordable Care Act (ACA), the CMS Innovation Center (CMMI) was created to promote quality healthcare, stronger health outcomes, and encourage fiscal responsibility. CMMI acts as the facilitator for designing the most efficient payment methodology for reimbursing healthcare providers based on value rather than volume. CMMI also provides a platform for doctors, stakeholders, and other health care partners to participate in a collaborative process for generating the ultimate pay-for-performance model.nnCMMI is responsible for the implementation and oversight of Quality Payment Program (QPP), which aligns all other incentive programs such as Meaningful Use, Value Based Payment Modifier, and PQRS. Practices will begin to see the financial impact of QPP starting in 2018. Upcoming CMMI initiatives include:n
n
- Diabetes Prevention Program (DPP) Expansion
n
- Acute Myocardial Infarction Model
n
- Coronary Artery Bypass Graft Model
n
- Cardiac Rehabilitation Incentive Payment Model
n
- Comprehensive Primary Care Plus Model
n
- Surgical Hip and Femur Fracture Treatment Model
n
- Accountable Health Communities Model
n
- State Innovation Models
n
n
Click here to get on the CMMI listserv today to stay up to date on upcoming and new payment initiatives.
Sep 1, 2017 | Uncategorized
Biomechanical Device Coding: Spine surgery has been one of the specialties hardest hit by recent CPT code bundling, NCCI edit updates, code revisions and additions, and RVU decreases. Most recently, biomechanical device coding changes were implemented, which impacts many spine surgery practice’s bottom lines. This change essentially states that all anterior instrumentation is now bundled with device anchoring. This will affect all operative anterior spinal procedures that involve instrumentation and caging. CMS has stated they will only allow use of modifiers to bypass these bundling edits if the surgeon performs additional anterior instrumentation unre¬lated to anchoring the device. However, clinical documentation must support the medical necessity and detail the procedure at great length. It is imperative that spine surgery practices understand the fundamentals of compliant coding and clinical documentation as it pertains to these changes.n
CLICK HERE TO SUBMIT A CASE STUDY TO THE SURGERY CODING SERIES!
Page 17 of 38« First«...10...1516171819...30...»Last »